click for life-size
EMF (electromagnetic field) protection is necessary according to electro magnetic field (EMF) exposure research.EMF (electromagnetic field) exposure to power frequency (50-60 Hz) or above, damages cellular/neurological homeostasis and sleep parameters according to reputable peer reviewed research.
Brain wave electroencephalogram (EEG) is altered by wireless devices including your cell phone and wireless networks in the workplace. 5 minute cell phone calls break DNA strands in your brain! This is proven FACT; read the research cataloged here.
You should consider some form of EMF protection if you (or a loved one);uses a cell phone regularly (without shielded ear bud) or works in close proximity to several people who use cell phones; you live in close proximity to power lines, live or work within 300 meters of radio broadcast towers, cellular microwave base stations; you work in an office with 2.4 GHz wireless networks (or above or below an office with wireless network); or if you are experiencing unexplained muscle twitch, difficulty sleeping, inability to concentrate, degrading memory, degrading typing speed, balance deficit, headaches, fatigue.
If you've got children, take a drive past your kids' schools and make sure their school isn't sitting next to broadcast stations or cellular microwave base stations. Can you say attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADD/ADHD)?get EarthPulse®
BioMagnetic Field Supplementation for USD 399ºº
click for life-size
Dr. Mercola on cell phone safety (includes references to some very good peer reviewed research).
Environ
Health Perspect. 2003 Jun;111(7):881-3; discussion A408.
Nerve
cell damage in mammalian brain after exposure to microwaves from GSM mobile
phones.
Salford LG, Brun AE, Eberhardt JL, Malmgren L, Persson BR.
Department of Neurosurgery, Lund University, The Rausing Laboratory and Lund
University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Three groups each of eight rats were exposed for 2 hr to Global System for Mobile
Communications (GSM) mobile phone electromagnetic fields of different strengths.
We found highly significant (p< 0.002) evidence for neuronal damage in the
cortex, hippocampus, and basal ganglia in the brains of exposed rats.
Int
J Neurosci. 2003 Jul;113(7):1007-19.
Effects
of high-frequency electromagnetic fields on human EEG: a brain mapping study.
Kramarenko AV, Tan U.
Central Clinic Hospital N5, Kharkov, Ukraine.
Mobile Phones may Trigger Alzheimer's disease; February 2003 (from BBC)
Med
Hypotheses. 2002 Dec;59(6):703-5.
Cellular
telephones and effects on the brain: the head as an antenna and brain tissue
as a radio receiver.
Weinberger Z, Richter ED.
Jerusalem College of Technology, Jerusalem, Israel.
Headache and other neuropsychological symptoms occur in users of cellular telephones,
and controversy exists concerning risks for brain cancer. We hypothesize these
effects result from the head serving as an antenna and brain tissue as a radio
receiver. Brain cells and tissues demodulate the cell-phone's audio frequencies
from the radio frequency carrier. Low audio frequencies in the ranges of alpha
and beta waves affect these waves and thereby influence brain function. These
effects state the case for a precautionary policy.
Med
Pr. 2002;53(4):311-4.
[Effect
of electromagnetic field produced by mobile phones on the activity of superoxide
dismutase (SOD-1) and the level of malonyldialdehyde (MDA)--in vitro study]
[Article in Polish]
Stopczyk D, Gnitecki W, Buczynski A, Markuszewski L, Buczynski J.
Zakladu Medycyny Zapobiegawczej i Promocji Zdrowia, Wojskowej Akademii Medycznej
w Lodzi.
Bioelectromagnetics.
2003 Jan;24(1):66-9.
Testing
the effectiveness of small radiation shields for mobile phones.
Oliver JP, Chou CK, Balzano Q.
Corporate EME Research Laboratory, Plantation, Florida 33322, USA.
THEY DON'T WORK!!!!
Med
Pr. 2002;53(4):311-4.
[Effect
of electromagnetic field produced by mobile phones on the activity of superoxide
dismutase (SOD-1) and the level of malonyldialdehyde (MDA)--in vitro study]
[Article in Polish]
Stopczyk D, Gnitecki W, Buczynski A, Markuszewski L, Buczynski J.
Zakladu Medycyny Zapobiegawczej i Promocji Zdrowia, Wojskowej Akademii Medycznej
w Lodzi.
Pathol
Biol (Paris) 2002 Jul;50(6):369-73
Investigation
on the health of people living near mobile telephone relay stations: I/Incidence
according to distance and sex.
Santini R, Santini P, Danze JM, Le Ruz P, Seigne M.
Institut national des sciences appliquees, laboratoire de biochimie-pharmacologie,
batiment Louis Pasteur, 20, avenue Albert Einstein, 69621 Villeurbanne, France.
Women, significantly more often than men, complained of headache, nausea, loss
of appetite, sleep disturbance, depression, discomfort and visual perturbations.
This first study on symptoms experienced by people living in vicinity of cellular
base stations shows that, in view of radioprotection, minimal distance of people
from cellular phone base stations should not be less than 300 m. (985 feet)!
If you are a municipal /governmental employee (working in police station/municipal
offices/town hall), odds are you work right next to or under one of these base
stations.
ET
Don't Phone Home!
Lancet 2000 Nov 25;356(9244):1833-6
Physics and biology of mobile telephony.
Hyland GJ.
Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, UKHyland GJ:
"The effect of microwaves from a mobile phone... has an impact on the stability
of cells in the body. The main effects are neurological, causing headaches,
memory loss and also sleeping disorders," The researchers found that volunteers
had a disturbed sleep pattern for as much as 50 minutes after being exposed
to the radiation. "Even a short exposure to electromagnetic fields emitted
by mobile phones has an effect on brain physiology." read the Lancet abstract
by clicking here.
***Mutat
Res 1997 Jan 15;388(1):45-57
Evaluation
of potential genotoxicity of pulsed electric and electromagnetic fields used
for bone growth stimulation.
Jacobson-Kram D, Tepper J, Kuo P, San RH, Curry PT, Wagner VO, Putman DL.
Genetic Toxicology Division, Microbiological Associates, Inc., Rockville,
MD 20850, USA.
The data suggest that pulsed electric and electromagnetic fields of the types
and dose levels used in bone growth stimulation lack mutagenic and transforming
activity.
Health
Phys 2002 Sep;83(3):409-16
Assessing
compliance with power-frequency magnetic-field guidelines.
Bracken TD.
Several organizations have established guidelines for occupational exposure
to power-frequency magnetic fields 60 hertz; 1.0 millitesla (10 Gauss)
for the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 0.42 mT (4.2
Gauss) for the International Committee on Non-ionizing Radiation Protection,
and 1.6 mT (16 Gauss) for the National Radiation Protection Board
guidelines. EarthPulse®peak magnetic flux density less than 1 Gauss.
Neuroendocrinol
Lett 2002 Jul;23 Suppl 2:9-13
Potential
biological consequences of excessive light exposure: melatonin suppression,
DNA damage, cancer and neurodegenerative diseases.
Reiter RJ.
Department of Cellular and Structural Biology, The University of Texas Health
Science Center, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900, USA.
Health
Phys 2002 Apr;82(4):473-83
Electromagnetic
field standards in Central and Eastern European countries: current state and
stipulations for international harmonization.
Gajsek P, Pakhomov AG, Klauenberg BJ.
Air Force Research Laboratory, Directed Energy Bioeffects Division, Brooks
AFB, TX 78235, USA.
Electromagnetic field standards in the West are based upon the specific absorption
rate, which is proportional to tissue heating (thermal effects),
representing the basic restriction of exposure to Radio-Frequency (RF) fields.
On the other hand, Eastern European standards are designed to protect from
potential non-thermal effects that might be caused by chronic exposure
to very low intensities, where a so-called "power load" (a product of field
intensity and duration of exposure) represents the basic limitation.
Pathology
2002 Apr;34(2):201-2
Mobile
phones and your health.
Goding JW.
Dtsch
Med Wochenschr 2002 Apr 19;127(16):872
Sleep
disorders caused by electrosmog?
Schweisfurth H.
Klinikum, Thiemstrasse 111, 03048 Cottbus.
Crit
Rev Biomed Eng. 2001;29(1):125-33
Investigation
of brain potentials in sleeping humans exposed to the electromagnetic field
of mobile phones.
Lebedeva NN, Sulimov AV, Sulimova OP, Korotkovskaya TI, Gailus T.
Institute of Higher Nerve Activity and Neurophysiology, Russian Academy of
Sciences.
J
ECT 2001 Dec;17(4):259-63
Lack
of adverse cognitive effects of 1 Hz and 20 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic
stimulation at 100% of motor threshold over left prefrontal cortex in depression.
Speer AM, Repella JD, Figueras S, Demian NK, Kimbrell TA, Wasserman EM, Post
RM.
Biological Psychiatry Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National
Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892,
G
Ital Med Lav Ergon 2002 Oct-Dec;24(4):444-6
[Article
in Italian]
Macca I, Scapellato ML, Perini M, Virgili A, Saia B, Bartolucci GB.
Dipartimento di Medicina Ambientale e Sanita Pubblica, Universita degli Studi
di Padova.
J
Pharm Biomed Anal 2001 Nov;26(4):605-8
Effects
of acute exposure to the radiofrequency fields of cellular phones on plasma
lipid peroxide and antioxidase activities in human erythrocytes.
Moustafa YM, Moustafa RM, Belacy A, Abou-El-Ela SH, Ali FM.
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Suez Canal
University, Ismailia 41522, Egypt.
These results support the interaction of radiofrequency fields of cellular phones
with biological systems.
Health
Phys 2001 Oct;81(4):467-8
The
apparent endocrine effects of non-ionizing radiation: a new consideration in
determining exposure standards.
James WH.
Ann
Acad Med Singapore 2001 Sep;30(5):489-93
Electromagnetic
fields and health outcomes.
Knave B.
National Institute for Working Life, S-11279 Stockholm, Sweden.
Over the past two decades, there has been increasing interest in the biological
effects and possible health outcomes of weak, low-frequency electric and magnetic
fields. Epidemiological studies on magnetic fields and neurobehavioural reactions
have been presented. More recently, neurological, degenerative and heart
diseases have also been reported to be related to such electromagnetic fields.
Furthermore, the increased use of mobile phones worldwide has focussed interest
on the possible effects of radiofrequency fields of higher frequencies.
J
Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2001 Aug;23(4):424-30
Neuropsychological
effects of prefrontal slow rTMS in normal volunteers: a double-blind sham-controlled
study.
Koren D, Shefer O, Chistyakov A, Kaplan B, Feinsod M, Klein E.
Department of Psychiatry, B. Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Rambam Medical
Center, Haifa, Israel.
Pacing
Clin Electrophysiol 2001 Apr;24(4 Pt 1):489-95
Interference
with cardiac pacemakers by magnetic resonance imaging: are there irreversible
changes at 0.5 Tesla?
Vahlhaus C, Sommer T, Lewalter T, Schimpf R, Schumacher B, Jung W, Luderitz
B.
Medizinische Universitatsklinik und Poliklinik II, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitat
Bonn, Germany.
No permanent changes in pacemaker exposed to static magnetic field 5000 times
the strength of EarthPulse®.
Pacing
Clin Electrophysiol 2001 Feb;24(2):199-205
Force
and torque effects of a 1.5-Tesla MRI scanner on cardiac pacemakers and ICDs.
Luechinger R, Duru F, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P, Candinas R.
Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Medical Informatics, University of
Zurich, Switzerland
This study utilized static field 15,000 times the field strength of EarthPulse®.
J
ECT 2000 Dec;16(4):380-90
Lack
of significant changes on magnetic resonance scans before and after 2 weeks
of daily left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for depression.
Nahas Z, DeBrux C, Chandler V, Lorberbaum JP, Speer AM, Molloy MA, Liberatos
C, Risch SC, George MS.
Department of Psychiatry, The Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
Several studies have found that prefrontal rTMS has potential efficacy in treating
depression, and this technology, in addition to being a research tool, may soon
play a role in psychiatric practice. Thus, establishing the safety of this technology
is important and has been studied insufficiently.
Neuroreport
2000 Oct 20;11(15):3321-5
Exposure
to pulsed high-frequency electromagnetic field during waking affects human sleep
EEG.
Huber R, Graf T, Cote KA, Wittmann L, Gallmann E, Matter D, Schuderer J,
Kuster N, Borbely AA, Achermann P.
Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
The changes of brain function induced by pulsed high-frequency EMF outlast the
exposure period.
Pathol
Biol (Paris) 2000 Jul;48(6):525-8
[Danger
of cellular telephones and their relay stations]
[Article in French]
Santini R, Seigne M, Bonhomme-Faivre L.
Cellular phones and their base stations emit pulsed microwaves in the environment.
Cellular phone users are exposed in the near field and, under this condition,
a large part of the electromagnetic energy is absorbed by the head, leading
to an increased brain temperature. Some European countries (Italy, France,
Belgium, etc.) have taken measures to protect their populations.
Acta
Oncol 2000;39(8):927-30
Are
mobile phones harmful?
Blettner M, Berg G.
School of Public Health, University of Bielefeld, Germany.
Findings on the thermal effect of acute exposure to radiofrequency fields were
consistent, resulting in an increase of cellular, tissue or body temperature
by 1 degree C or more. If you get a sensation of warmth inside your head
when holding your cell phone to your ear (or useing a non-shielded headset),...your
not imagining it.
Med
Pr 2000;51(2):151-8
[Cellular
radio systems. Problems faced in assessing exposure to electromagnetic fields]
Zmyslony M.
Zakladu Zagrozen Fizycznych, Instytutu Medycyny Pracy, Lodzi
It should be stressed that standards adopted protect the user's head against
the thermal (heating) effect, whereas the question on whether they also protect
against non-thermal effects still remains without answer. Non-Thermal
effects are suspected of perpetrating several CNS disrupting effects as can
be shown in 60 Hz study below. It is hypothesised that PEMFs at brain-wave
specific frequencies help to reduce or completely ameliorate the deleterious
effects of higher frequency EMF exposure.
Lancet
2000 Nov 25;356(9244):1833-6
Physics
and biology of mobile telephony.
Hyland GJ.
There is evidence that the low intensity, pulsed radiation currently used can
exert subtle non-thermal influences. There are consistencies between some of
these effects and the neurological problems reported by some mobile-telephone
users and people exposed longterm to base-station radiation.
Med
Hypotheses 2000 Apr;54(4):630-3
The
effects of natural and man-made electromagnetic fields on mood and behavior:
the role of sleep disturbances.
Sher L.
The author further suggests that the development of sleep abnormalities in persons
exposed to artificial electromagnetic fields may predict the onset of a psychiatric
disorder at a later time and that early intervention may prevent the onset of
a psychiatric disease.
Int
J Biometeorol. 1999 Jul;43(1):31-7.
The
effects of extra-low-frequency atmospheric pressure oscillations on human mental
activity.
Delyukov A, Didyk L.
J
Sleep Res 1999 Mar;8(1):77-81
A
50-Hz electromagnetic field impairs sleep.
Akerstedt T, Arnetz B, Ficca G, Paulsson LE, Kallner A.
National Institute for Psychosocial Factors and Health, Karolinska Institute,
Stockholm, Sweden.
We found that the EMF condition was associated with reduced: total sleep time
(TST), sleep efficiency, stages 3 + 4 slow wave sleep (SWS), and slow wave activity
(SWA)
Bioelectromagnetics
1999;20(5):277-83
Human
sleep in 60 Hz magnetic fields.
Graham C, Cook MR.
Midwest Research Institute, Kansas City, Missouri 64110, USA.
60 htz fields (what you have in the home, office, hospital) found to disrupt
sleep at .28 gauss ( well below EarthPulse®peak field density). Showing
that fields as low as at least .28 gauss can affect the central nervous system.
Neuroreport
1998 Oct 5;9(14):3229-32
Mobile
phones modulate response patterns of human brain activity.
Eulitz C, Ullsperger P, Freude G, Elbert T.
Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Germany.
Environ
Health Perspect 1998 Mar;106(3):101-3
Headaches
from cellular telephones: are they real and what are the implications?
Frey AH.
Randomline, Inc., Potomac, MD 20854, USA.
There have been numerous recent reports of headaches occurring in association
with the use of hand-held cellular telephones. Are these reported headaches
real? Are they due to emissions from telephones? There is reason to believe
that the answer is "yes" to both questions.
Med
Pregl 1997 Sep-Oct;50(9-10):357-62
[The
effect of low-frequency electromagnetic fields on the neuroendocrine system]
[Article in Serbo-Croatian (Roman)]
Lazetic B, Kozarcic T, Stankov K.
Zavod za fiziologiju, Medicinski fakultet, Novi Sad.